As mentioned earlier there has been considerable disagreement among professionals about the validity of vision therapy. This is due to inconsistent findings in scientific literature and inadequate study designs. A National Eye Institute (NEI)-funded study using multi-center, randomized, double-blind clinical trials showed that for a condition called convergence insufficiency (eye teaming difficulty) office-based vision therapy was successful in 75% of patients, and resulting in normal or significantly improved symptoms. Office-based therapy was found to be more effective than home-based and placebo therapy in children.
While vision therapy clearly helps in amblyopia (wearing an eye patch improves vision in the "lazy" eye) and in convergence insufficiency (as noted by Dr. Raghuram), for the most part there aren't a lot of clinical trials that support this treatment to the point that it has been accepted by the community of ophthalmologists. That said, we do encounter many children who have abnormalities with eye tracking, accommodation, and vergence, and we have seen many patients benefit from some of these treatments. In an effort to try to help children who might be struggling in school because of one of these conditions, we offer evaluation and, in some cases, treatment, or in other cases, referral to tutors or other experts in learning or neuropsychological development. In addition, Dr. Raghuram is currently developing research protocols to compare vision therapy with placebo treatment in patients willing to participate in research. The goal is to someday either validate or disprove many of the common approaches to vision therapy.