Developmental Intervention for Hospitalized Newborns With Congenital Heart Disease

Neurodevelopmental (ND) disabilities are the most common, and arguably the most distressing, long-term morbidity in survivors of critical congenital heart disease (CHD).1 As mortality rates for infants with CHD have declined, the need to optimize neurological and ND outcomes in survivors has assumed ever-greater importance. A myriad of studies document that longer ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) after newborn surgery are among the strongest independent risk factors for ND delay, even after adjusting for known complications and patient factors. Few rigorous studies, however, have thoroughly tested the efficacy of bedside interventions to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes by reducing the environmental toxicities for newborns in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) and other in-patient settings. Individualized Developmental Care (IDC) is an intervention that maximizes the infant neurobiological needs and minimizes the harsh hospital environment, thereby diminishing the frequency and severity of adverse effects and improves long-term developmental outcomes. Core components of IDC include support and education for the family at the bedside on how to care for an ill infant, acknowledging family as the primary caregiver, incorporation of family into hands on care and positive touch, medical caregiving that reduces infant stress and supports the infant throughout, and providing a soothing environment to promote healing, growth and learning. The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP)2, 3 is the only evidence-based, comprehensive, internationally recognized program of IDC. IDC in the NIDCAP model has been shown to improve outcomes for premature infants with enhanced brain structure and function, along with improved behavioral outcomes that endure beyond infancy and into school age. In addition, many NIDCAP studies report benefits for medical outcomes such as decreased length of ICU and of hospital stay, earlier oral feeding, and increased weight gain.4-11 IDC as a developmental care intervention is novel in the CHD population, i.e., it has not been routinely used or tested in newborns with CHD. There is a critical need to translate this effective intervention of IDC into policy and routine care service for all infants and children hospitalized, especially those with CHD. This study supports the recent outreach to improve the implementation of effective interventions identified as a priority of health care systems and research agencies internationally.12 The proposed study would thus be the first to test the feasibility of IDC as a hospital intervention for very high-risk newborns with CHD. In this pilot single-center, single blind, before-and-after feasibility study, the investigators will compare two types of experience, standard newborn care (SOC) and the newborn intervention of developmental care (IDC) strictly following the NIDCAP model of care in the cardiology inpatient unit. The investigators will focus on the process of implementing NIDCAP care in cardiology. Following this feasibility study, the researchers will then identify strategies to address the noted challenges and/or revise components of the intervention prior to designing a multisite study to more formally evaluate the NIDCAP intervention in cardiology. Specific aims are as follows: Primary Aim: To describe feasibility for providing IDC for infants with CHD while inpatient in cardiology. The investigators will describe organizational/contextual factors, which influence future implementation trial methods, such as recruitment, retention, data collection procedures, implementation of study protocol, and any safety concerns. Hypothesis 1: IDC will be feasible to implement in the CICU and the cardiology step down unit/ Acute Cardiology Care Unit (ACCU). Infants who receive the IDC intervention will show an appropriate level (score of 3.5 or higher) of developmental care at the bedside during caregiving on the measure of developmental care (NIDCAP Organizational Structures Assessment13 (OSA)) scored by a study observer blind to study group. The IDC group infants will have higher scores on the OSA measurement of developmental care at the bedside than the SOC group infants. Hypothesis 2: It will be possible to recruit enough patients into the study over the two year time frame. The investigators will collect the number of patients eligible for the study, number approached for the study, the number consented, and those that discontinue or drop from the study, along with reasoning for why someone did not meet criteria or choose to leave the study. . Hypothesis 3: There will be no safety concerns as reported by the Safety Event Reporting System (SERS) in connection with this NIDCAP study. The investigators will review each month the number of SERS reported in the CICU and ACCU related to the study. Secondary Aims To describe the feasibility of collecting the developmental outcome assessments in this cardiac population. Hypothesis 1: It will be feasible to collect the Neonatal Network Neurobehavioral Scale II (NNNS) and the Developmental Assessment of Young Children-Second Edition (DAYC-2) on this population of infants. The number of missing variables will be assessed. To demonstrate sufficient differentiation of developmental care and to estimate potential effect sizes to inform the design of an adequately powered trial (using the OSA scores and parent diaries). To describe feasibility of increasing parent participation at the bedside, large component of NIDCAP care, for infants with CHD while inpatient in cardiology. Hypothesis 1: Infants in the intervention group (IDC), receiving NIDCAP care will have parents who are more engaged at the bedside with higher scores (indicated increased engagement) on the Parent Risk Evaluation and Engagement Model Instrument (PREEMI) than parents of infants receiving SOC. Hypothesis 2: Due to the increased attention to parent infant interaction given through the NIDCAP intervention, parents in the IDC group will report more time at the bedside and more daily interaction with their child on the daily diary of care than parents in the SOC group. Our feasibility trial will provide the first, urgently needed, proof-of-concept that IDC can be implemented in hospitalized critically ill newborns with CHD. When proven to be successful, this study will provide information vital to funding of a multicenter randomized trial further expanding the knowledge of IDC for infants with CHD.